[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12516504 [View]
File: 204 KB, 1440x900, beau_garrett_tron_legacy_2010-1440x900.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12516504

>>12516497
Another comfy one is
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallpaper_group

>> No.12516416 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 204 KB, 1440x900, beau_garrett_tron_legacy_2010-1440x900.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12516416

>>12516355
Well we have that
[math](x^{n+1}-1)^n=(x-1)^n\left(\sum_{k=0}^n x^k\right)^n =_{n=2} \left(\sum_{k=0}^n x^k\right)^n[/math]
which further expands as a "relatively simple" multinomial expression (which have binomial coefficients with products of k! in the denominator, but all the x-terms are very basic)

and on the other hand the standard binomial expression
[math](x^n+1)^{n+1} = \sum_{k=0}^{n+1} {{n+1} \choose k} x^{n+(n+1-k)} [/math]
and you gotta e.g. argue that those binomial coefficients are each always smaller.

There's a chance that if you write down the multinomial expression explicitly, you can compare it to n+1 over k and find it's true on the nose.

There might also be a smarter way, I don't know..

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]