/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7245769
its easy to understand why the quoted non-science claims are false

being pro-nuclear (or at least, not anti-nuclear) seems to be too mentally difficult for most people

>what's all the cockamamie "neutron cross-section" horseradish? NO NUKES!

there's plenty of perfectly rational smart people with really fucking dumb opinions on nuclear energy because of this

>church
GTFO

Nuclear power? No thanks! I'll stick with the sun, which is the best non-nuclear source of energy there is.

>>3942880

>>3900126
it's fun to posit this logo to nuclear energy antagonists, and then follow up with "what does the sun do?"

>>3900136
Rickover was kind of dick. He basically built the nuclear navy which i have great respect for, but he was bullheaded and had a bad habit of using his influence to remove opponents or dissenters.

It's time for environmentally-minded people to put an end to nuclear power, which bellows massive amounts of carbon dioxide out of its enormous smoke stacks. ITT we post viable green energy sources that do not rely on nuclear reactions. I'll start:

The sun