/sci/ - Science & Math

The function that is called local zera function in the Weil conjectures has properties (the zeros theorem on the critical line) akin to the Riemann zeta function. But it's not like the Riemann zeta function has a nice representation
[math] \zeta(s) = \exp(...) [/math]
Right?

I'm asking because I'm looking e.g. at the Lefschetz zeta function, which looks like that of the Weil conjecture, but any connection to Riemanns seems lost

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lefschetz_zeta_function
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_zeta_functions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weil_conjectures#Statement_of_the_Weil_conjectures

>>9357236
I fell for the cryptocurrency meme and got into smart contract programming
https://youtu.be/CAUo5aNmvz8

Right now I'm coding a decentralized voting dApp and want to implement some of the many systems. Here are some pointers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow%27s_impossibility_theorem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_electoral_systems

I'm open for all kinds of contributions, whether on the logic, overview or coding side, and it's easy money on the side too. Write me :^)

Also, I think, in what I said before,
>the predicate P_X the uniquely characterizes X
was a blunder

cont. 2

Asia is adopting it quickly, Chinese people generally being ahead of the curve in terms of tech adoption compared to old people in the US. Japan has made it essentially a legal currency, Korea is following.

Well okay, I have three ineresting points of opinion to offer that I don't hear people express too often.
Firstly, people are fuzzy about the value and use structure of the tech, and I think it will become clear in the future and it goes like this: Crypto is not about transfers from people to people but from people to institution and companies. If you read this and don't know Smart Contracts, this might make no sense but essentially in the last two years a crowdfunding system has established itself and this is not a bug but I'd say the main feature. This goes back to anyone being able to buy stocks. This will stick around.
Something that people, even those invest, don't quite see is that a blockchain is more like "http" (hypertext transfer protocol) than anything else. The money aspect is a side effect of the immutable aspect of a blockchain. In general, folks only use a browser as a magic window for hypertext and websites, but the thing that's being developed is simply a way to use the existing internet. And it works and will not go away.
So apart from single currency chains (Bitcoin, Bitcoin cash, litecoin, zcash, dash, monero, etc.) you got many ideas for the tech, from banks (Ripple) to distributed file sharing (Filecoin) and use and abuse for social networks (Steen). The big players, however, will be the chains on which you can issue other token (Ethereum, NEO, NEM, Lisk, Stratis, EOS). Ethereum made the start, but for some fucking reason they wanted to have their own gimmicky C++/Javascript looking hybrid (among others) be converted to the virtual machine and as a result it's fairly hard to to get into it. Lisk uses Javascript, and I can't judge it, and several teams are now trying to do it with .Net/C#, which is the best route. NEO, Stratis, EOS.

Asia is adopting it quickly, Chinese people generally being ahead of the curve in terms of tech adoption compared to old people in the US. Japan has made it essentially a legal currency, Korea is following.

Well okay, I have three ineresting points of opinion to offer that I don't hear people express too often.
Firstly, people are fuzzy about the value and use structure of the tech, and I think it will become clear in the future and it goes like this: Crypto is not about transfers from people to people but from people to institution and companies. If you read this and don't know Smart Contracts, this might make no sense but essentially in the last two years a crowdfunding system has established itself and this is not a bug but I'd say the main feature. This goes back to anyone being able to buy stocks. This will stick around.
Something that people, even those invest, don't quite see is that a blockchain is more like "http" (hypertext transfer protocol) than anything else. The money aspect is a side effect of the immutable aspect of a blockchain. In general, folks only use a browser as a magic window for hypertext and websites, but the thing that's being developed is simply a way to use the existing internet. And it works and will not go away.
So apart from single currency chains (Bitcoin, Bitcoin cash, litecoin, zcash, dash, monero, etc.) you got many ideas for the tech, from banks (Ripple) to distributed file sharing (Filecoin) and use and abuse for social networks (Steen). The big players, however, will be the chains on which you can issue other token (Ethereum, NEO, NEM, Lisk, Stratis, EOS). Ethereum made the start, but for some fucking reason they wanted to have their own gimmicky C++/Javascript looking hybrid (among others) be converted to the virtual machine and as a result it's fairly hard to to get into it. Lisk uses Javascript, and I can't judge it, and several teams are now trying to do it with .Net/C#, which is the best route. NEO, Stratis, EOS.