/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12633330
That anon is basically saying the other post is one big Freudian slip. That all the metaphors he uses are unwitting innuendos. Something sick involving children, adults and erections.

When most people say "Freudian" they just mean this kind of thing: sexual interpretation of your allegorical speech.

Freud was certainly about this, but he wasn't ALL about this. He had very interesting things to say about the way dreams are structured into our daily lives. And he was also a dangerous quack who should have never been allowed anywhere near a prescription pad.

I know this is a rocket (OMG PHALLUS LOL) thread but if you want to stop being a Freud brainlet without having to slog through Freud, read this:

http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=E1AB354B3C24EA42F909C146E6E40A57

ALSO, The Oedipus Complex was bullshit and Freud knew it. Most of his early patients were Viennese Jewish adults who came to him with mental problems stemming from child molestation. He presented this finding to his colleagues, also Viennese jews, and they persuaded him to cover it up. And so the Oedipus and Electra complexes were born: the first formalized victim blaming.

>>12633353
I just listened to REM cassettes over and over while memorizing the exhibits. Also watched every Imax film twice. And the planetarium shows.
My childhood was lonely, but not without its consolations.

One of the great things about the Smithsonian is that the Capitol Mall museums are free.