[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.12552219 [View]
File: 124 KB, 602x843, Shuttle-C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12552219

>>12552191
>Shuttle C
That's what we should've gotten instead of SLS

>> No.12275429 [View]
File: 124 KB, 602x843, Shuttle-C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12275429

>>12275417
That's what SLS should've been.

>> No.12257132 [View]
File: 124 KB, 602x843, Shuttle-C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12257132

>>12257122
>So either A) SSMEs were always bumfuck expensive and NASA just presented 1980 cost figures or B) It really was $40 Million in 2000, but then Cost+ happened
Both still seem sad. God damnit NASA needs to get it's shit together and kick out the rot from within even if it pisses off everyone all the way to Congress. Their SLS antics took space away from America for a decade and only made things worse outside of commercial spaceflight.

>> No.12112457 [View]
File: 124 KB, 602x843, Shuttle-C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12112457

>>12112439
>he hasn't heard about Shuttle-C

>> No.11985219 [View]
File: 124 KB, 602x843, Shuttle-C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11985219

>>11985147
That's too close to Shuttle-C and NASA reflexively hates Shuttle-C.

>> No.11977634 [View]
File: 124 KB, 602x843, Shuttle-C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11977634

>>11977620
The Shuttle closed alot of paths that might have been better. Even its own improvements suffered due to the terrible management of the program.

>> No.11816150 [View]
File: 124 KB, 602x843, Shuttle-C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11816150

>Is the Shuttle but cheaper
>Reuses Shuttle hardware
>Was shut down because it threatened manned space flight

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]