/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9297162
Speculation is not evidence. For example, evidence would be a project which analyzes temperature stations for micro-site biases and then compares the best sited stations to all the data. Let's try googling for microsite analysis (I know it's very hard to open google and look for evidence to support your position, so I'll do it for you). Oh look, here's a study that did that:

https://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2/monthly/menne-etal2010.pdf

And yes, it finds a clear bias in the temperature stations!

Oh wait, it seems that it's a slight cooling bias. Oh well I guess it supports the exact opposite of what you claim... So I can see why someone would not even try to look for evidence when it keeps proving the opposite of what they're trying to claim.