/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10037008
Another brainlet can't make his point but wants to state his socially imposed opinion

>>10036894
I have autism and ADHD. For focus nothing has been superior to meth. It is the holy grail of amphetamines.

>inb4 adhd denial. See >>/sci/thread/S9900417


You avoid all peripheral sides due to better pharmacodynamics (which usually cause sensory overstimulating due to my autism) and it has the longest action and is very tolerable and even nootropic at a single dose as early as possible in the day between 2.5-30mg. The dosage depends on how you metabolize it/tolerate it.

If I had to guess, I'd say:

1- Meth for attention/concentration and other potential improvements like mood stabilization. This is very dependent on your brain functionality or pathology. Some people might feel nothing but anxiety and disturbances from it. But I think anyone would benefit from the much lower doses if that's a concern (2.5-5mg)

2-nAChR agonists(?) see figure but do your own research

3-Antidepressants if you have depression and if they are going to treat that depression(?)

4-memantine(?) if you dig deep enough you might find some non heavily established concerns

5-racetams, nootropics, >>10037544, and a other nootropics that don't have much evidence
>>10036922
see
>>10031299
>>10032911

Then comeback and call me names