/sci/ - Science & Math

>we can have selective dopamine/serotonin/nonephinephrine receptor agonists/antagonists
>we can have selective SERT or NET inhibitors
>we can have serotonin or nonephinerine releasing agents
>we can have zillion NRI/SNRI phenethylamines, cathinones and alike substances (ofc, pretty much all controlled, but hey you still can get rx with "right" doc ;^) )
>but we can't have turbo potent purely selective for DAT inhibitor or/and dopamine releasing agent that isn't controlled so docs can actually rx it without pain in the ass if something goes amiss
I wish it wasn't all for pharma money.... I hope that at least that new TAAR1 agonist and glycine modulator for schizos will be more interesting and actually helpful so they can be a little more calm if they can't be lucid... but that's prolly wishful thinking since drug development for glutamate based drugs for my own condition (ADHD) is in deep ass and professional help for it in the world ranges from pill mills (pretty much only US) to pain in the ass to even get Ritalin prescribed (assuming it's even legal in some countries) despite having stack of papers since 2006 of how much of lilttle insufferable shit I was (and still very much am) and doing it purely private

tl;dr Yes, I made a big blob of text. No, I will not make my own thread, /med/ deserves bump more so than killing some rando dumb thread
>>15212928
But she will get fat :c