/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12065850
Nice try calling it a hoax, but AGW has abundant empirical evidence supporting it. It is a serious threat. We should take it seriously.

>>11885934
>>11885953
it is reality

>>11741692
>fossils fuels should be preserved in case of a Little Ice Age, which is very likely to happen in the next 5 decades
Hello, fossil fuel shill. Here to spread more disinfo and muddy the waters about a thoroughly verified phenomenon to protect your boss's profits? Fossil fuels continue to be used and their growth is expanding, despite the horrific consequences that are only decades away. You wretched disinfo peddling sycophants are some of the worst scum alive. This is nothing short of an environmental catastrophe, but oh, "there's going to be an ice age" when exactly none of the measurement data supports your dishonest conclusion. Neoliberal capitalism is already dead in theory, and will be dead in actuality in a century or two when environmental catastrophe becomes geopolitical catastrophe. Fuck you.

>>11094562
They're not saying "because I said so," they're saying "look at this enormous set of data we've collected and this plot of it that shows warming over time."

>>11033046
Like this empirical evidence? Or carbon isotope analysis showing dilution by fossil fuel carbon-12 in the atmosphere?
>warming causes CO2
Prove it. Paleoclimate reconstructions show a relatively high correlation between CO2 levels and global mean temperature despite significant error sources, but no significant evidence for a delay between one or the other. You also have no theoretical explanation for such a correlation. "Dude smoke" isn't exactly convincing.

>>11014061
oops, you're wrong again