[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.10828255 [View]
File: 25 KB, 384x400, 1551314009437.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10828255

>>10826970
>Physics is the Philosophy of STEM
you misspelled mathematics wrong
theoretical physics are more like woman's studies

>> No.10764218 [View]
File: 25 KB, 384x400, 1551314009437.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10764218

>>10762388
based

>> No.9942750 [View]
File: 25 KB, 384x400, 5c6d0ac594e94e223cfc25e2451dc9b4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9942750

>>9936049
>>9936057
>>9936070
>>9936083
>>9936089
>>9936094
>>9936131
>>9936110
>>9936162
>>9936304
>>9936312
>>9936931
>>9936948
>>9937126
Let's all calm down and take an introspective look at our arguments. All of them rely on metaphysical assumptions (yes, materialism does too.) As they are such assumptions, asserting any of these as the truth or even as being more likely to be the truth is naive. I hate to pull the "can't know nuthin" out, but the principle of conciousness and the presence or lack thereof a soul all rely on as of yet unanswerable assumptions that have been both defended and challenged. As much as discussion about these metaphysical problems is fun to read about on this website, it would be more prudent to actually read about the positions from a rigorous source than to attack each other with preconceived biases. OP, if you are looking for a plausible answer, you won't find it in this thread or in a library. No one either knows or can certify plausibility (at least as of yet.)

>> No.9864746 [View]
File: 25 KB, 384x400, 5c6d0ac594e94e223cfc25e2451dc9b4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9864746

>3.14.. ..9876543210...
Will it be found?
Or will it be created?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]