[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15677248 [View]
File: 135 KB, 363x296, apu1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15677248

>>15677221
>don't have a wife.
I know that feel.

>> No.12472551 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1605049338282.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12472551

>>12472527
The moment Biden takes office they are pushing Artemis back another 4 years to 2028

>> No.12348425 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1605049338282.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12348425

>>12348401
>be me
>first time astronaut
>launch goes perfectly
>want to celebrate with some smores
>turn on the heater
>share smores with crewmates
>heater won't turn off
>NASA is yelling at me over the com
>whole mission might get scrubbed now
>ignore coms and tell /sfg/ my plight
>mfw

>> No.11917947 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1502405956932.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11917947

is geology a dead field

>> No.11629600 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1587318169187.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11629600

>>11629525
turn 360 degrees and leave

>> No.11201113 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1495709806504.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11201113

>genetically engineered nigger containment breach
>can hear his mix-tape through the vents
It was a pleasure guys...

>> No.10928172 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1564600051846.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10928172

>>10927906
>histology
I still have flashbacks about that shit.

>> No.10851271 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1563999588633.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10851271

>>10851264
And how can I do it on my own? I am studying and I need to learn about those probability distributions and how to calculate them but when I watch khanacademy and so on I get confused and can't remember it all. Can you please help me?

>> No.10833462 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1496681111287.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10833462

What do you guys think of highschool dropouts? Are we irredeemable brainlets in your eyes?

>> No.10805271 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1495709806504.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10805271

>Wash my clothes wrong
>Lab coat is now a mesh of purple and pink
>Friends at uni make fun of me for looking like a pimp

>> No.10782298 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1562345324196.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10782298

>go to /lit/
>get into a debate about the epistemology of science
>tell them about neuroscience
>get laughed at

>> No.10598820 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1547967928786.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10598820

>>10598599
Yikesy wikesy, someone made a doodoo outside the looloo

>> No.10207188 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1540643777718.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10207188

>has exam in applied engineering mathematics
>seems fine overall
>one task is to find eigenvectors of complex eigenvalues
>OH FUG I FORGOT HOW TO DO THAT :DDDD
>misses 2 potential points
>gets to fourier series
>figures out a formula in the end despite it being based on a very difficult integral
>forgets if the coefficient outside the integral is L/2 or 2/L so just notes that I forgot it
>checking it out my answer after the exam, it's completely correct
>has a task on probability
>accidentally write one P(X) as 1/3 instead of 2/3 despite even the formula I wrote down would equal 2/3. Thus this number screws up the rest of the task although the answer and the formulas are otherwise fully correct

I am fairly sure I got everything else correct though.
If we ignore the first problem I had, does censors usually pull down the score tremendously because of small mistakes like these? Do they give decent points as I show correct thinking and formulas?

>> No.10111560 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, sad.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10111560

/sci/ how much of success in stuff like calculus and physics is based on inherent IQ/intelligence vs just hard work and stubbornness to learn and study the material. Ive avoided those subjects because i always told myself i was too brainlet to do them and could never do it. but now im feeling down on myself wondering if i just took the easy way out and that ill never feel satisfied if I dont at least try them. then i see you all talking about it so casually and feel like a true subhuman retard.

>> No.10089066 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1539065148207.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10089066

>all the girls laugh at the professor's jokes but not yours

>> No.9887591 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1521493806086.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9887591

We experience time relative to the rest of the time we have been alive. A year for a 10 year old is 10% of their life, for a 100 year old, 1% of their life so far.

More formally, if we're considering years as our units, a single year makes up 1/Y of our total life, where Y is our age in years.

However, instead of considering an arbitrary unit like years or minutes, we'll consider an infinitesimally small unit of time, dt. Lets also assume we begin measuring from when we're 1, coz who even remembers being younger than 1?
Then, the total relative time (RT) that we live for is
[math]\int_1^T \frac{1}{t}dt = ln(T) - ln(1) = ln(T)[/math]

If the average life expectancy is 80, the RT value will be 4.382.
Then to be truly middle aged, you would have a RT value of 4.382/2=2.191.
This RT value corresponds to the age e^{2.191} which occurs at age 8.94 or roughly 9 years old. Woah

>> No.9168225 [View]
File: 136 KB, 363x296, 1495709806504.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9168225

>tfw fell for the hard work meme

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]