/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4330512
>I get top, bottom, and up, down.
>I don't get "strange" and "charm"

You obviously don't fucking get any of them. What you said doesn't make any sense. It is like saying you understand what a "red sphere" is, but not an "orange sphere" . LMFAO

>>3278747
>no one has ever seen

>no direct evidence whatsoever

>still believe it exists

Yes I'm talking about wind

>>3062506
While the strongest people in certain competitions may be white I would definitely argue that on a whole black people are the most athletically inclined race. White people seem to settle near the bottom or the top while black people fill the upper middle to top. also, BRASH GENERALIZATIONS!!!!!

>>2271673
>How does it make sense to the big bang have occurred if no one made it?"

The problem you have is that you assume shit has to have a creator. In the real universe we see shit being created with no creator what so ever. Virtual particles for example, just pop into existance. They are very well documented, and there is tons of science involved in predicting where they will appear and shit.

So, not all things need a "creator" to exist.

\thread
\thread

>>2213248
It becomes meaningless to think about a "magnetic field" as some entity that exists by itself. >>2210185

The magnetic field in one frame is the electric field in another. And since that is the case, you can just say you have electric fields causing the "force" and "work".

>>2036222
>engineers are usually dumb as fuck

some peope don't know how to plug-and chug properly....DURRRR

>>1911990
Ok, give me a minute, let me see what I got lying around

>>1260083
Another /sci/ meme

We all know that engineers = faggots
but what about transhumanist?
any ideas for the next /sci/ meme?

>>1244442
>I thought decay was caused by quantum tunneling and was due to the uncertainty principle, not a force?

I dont understand, why would you think this.
I think you have the wrong Idea of "force". The weak force, isnt really to be thought of as a "force" like in classical mech. This kinda force is associated with a fundemental particle interaction. The particle weak particle interaction explains the decay.

>>1147017
ITS NOT FUCKING TESLA, HE WAS A FAGGOT (AN ENGINEER), NOT A SCIENTIST!

The key to a "free" energy device is not by drawing power out of nothing, but by creating perpetual motion in an electric generator.