/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3492441

I consider myself a good person. I donate to charity, am friendly to strangers, generally unselfish, I've never cheated on a significant other, my criminal record is a blank slate (but for a speeding ticket.)

I also don't believe in God, nor do I follow any religion. Why all the asspain over Atheists?

Also, I genuinely believe that I've never met a Christian. I've met people who call themselves various denominations of Christianity (Baptist, Anglican, Presbyterian, Catholic, et cetera) but none of them actually... you know... go to church... they 'sin' left and right and don't really think much of it... but apparently the Christian tag gives them a feeling of superiority.

Religion should not be a part of your identity. You should not call yourself Christian/Muslim/blah blah if you don't actually do anything that involves the tenets of the faith you claim as your identity.

This seems most prevalent in the United States, but I'm curious what people think around the gloooobe

To Atheists:

How did the world became to exist? How did the first humans come from? If there is creation there must be a creator and it is God.

Does science prove atheism???

You can't prove God exists

Athiests are like stuff.. discuss.

Does anybody else hate the terms "atheist" and "agnostic"?

There really shouldn't be any term to label people who don't believe in God. They should just be referred to as normal people and everybody else should be referred to as "theists". Seriously. The existence of the words "atheist" and "agnostic" make it seem like there is no default stance. There IS a default stance. The default stance is to be FUCKING NORMAL.

/rant