/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15919556
I responded to this
>including what was found on bodies
so far you haven't given anything. Hair? Now you're talking about traces found in the supposed corpse cellar building which must then mean that 1.1 million were systematically exterminated using zyklon b pellets thrown down holes in the roof into meshes?
I can't argue the chemistry because I am not a chemist so I can't evaluate either side of the argument, my training is in maths.
>How do you autopsy a full body when they've been burnt in a crematorium?
ah yes, the evidence destroying machines. Where are the ashes?
https://youtu.be/ltjI3BXKBgY?feature=shared&t=90
In this...pond?
>So rather than accept analysis of what remains were recovered, you'd rather go
the hair?

>>15246870
The documentation that is used, such as the Wansee Conference, or the aforementioned telegrams and reports can only be used as evidence if one [math] \textit{already beleives} [/math] in the Holocaust. Because supposedly everything was in code words, and nothing was really what they meant. The evidence for this is circular; we know it's code because we know what happened, and we know what happened because it's in the code.
Now onto physical evidence. First of all, every camp had crematoria. Including the ones in the West which are not claimed to be death camps today (though strangely they were back then, but whatever). For obvious reasons, to stop the spread of disease and to hold a large population of inmates.
I believe what he is referring to>>15246851 is the Soviet "reconstructions" of alleged gas chambers.
So to be clear, there is practically no evidence of gas chambers. For example the Auschwitz floor plans for the an alleged gas chamber had that room labeled as "morgue".
The claims of gassing at other camps -- like some of the Reinhardt camps -- are really so unbelievable that one can dismiss it on it's face (nearly). The claim was that diesel engines were used. In one case using a Soviet tank. Now if I didn't know any better that would sound to me like someone just thinking "the biggest smelliest exhaust is surely the most deadly!" (it's not). There is no evidence for this either. Thanks to the German evidence destroying machines.
Similarity with the bodies. There are no mass graves akin to this>>15246745 in Cambodia.
The claims are, again, silly. In the case of Auschwitz the story has changed. Originally millions of people of people's ashes were thrown into this pic rel little pond
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ltjI3BXKBgY&feature=share&utm_source=EKLEiJECCKjOmKnC5IiRIQ
Eventually it changed into only tens of thousands, the rest spread out and used as fertilizer or something
(cont)