/sci/ - Science & Math

>What's your major?
>Nursing
>I thought nursing was for girls...

I'm back, fuckers. Only for another hour or so, gotta go back to work soon.

>>3498847

You call this trolling?

>both sides of the story

Anyone in favor of OP not being allowed to reproduce, say "aye".

>>3038561

This fellow from one of the other threads puts it best:

>I'm a nuclear engineer and 90% of the stuff in this thread is bullshit. Are you guys confusing control rods with fuel rods? As long as the reactor isn't breached the decay products should be contained, and even then there would be a containment structure AROUND the reactor to mitigate the leak. Also some people are really overblowing the idea of these heavy radioactive elements becoming airborne. They're heavy, they're going to fall and soak into the ground.
If this plant doesn't use a graphite moderator (I'd bet it doesn't) it's going to be physically impossible for it to Chernobyl.

Seriously , how hard is it to make a distinction between the conditions which prompted Chernobyl and what occurred to the Daiichi plant?

ok math nerds help me
find the measure of an angle if its supplement measures 4 degrees less than 3 times its compliment

>>2317132
It is deterministic in such a way that it will yield a probabilistic wave function
or
it is a randomly distributed wave function.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor