/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7010896
Psychologists are failed neurobiologists.

>>6834193
Not only are they dumber by one standard deviation ( that's shitskin level m8 ), but they have less high-IQ individuals, who are essential to technological civilisation.

>ONE STANDARD DEVIATION

>>6826247
>man/woman
Sure, it's technically possible for a woman to be the most intelligent human.
I guess.

>>6764213
Don't worry got your back m8 :^)

>>6627325
Most high-IQ are males.

Woman have a smaller standard deviation in intelligence plus modern intelligence tests to bias in females favor by giving points for non-g-loaded shit like verbal 'intelligence'.

So woman have both a lower real Get Shit Done intelligence and well as a narrower spread in intelligence, this will obviously result in massive over representation of men in the extreme right of the intelligence curve, where you'd find prodigies.

Pic related.
There is a difference of proportion, of course you can find smart women but their number will be less than man

>>2641952
>Pay Gap

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH OH WOW


Men work more hours, more years, almost all of the most dangerous jobs, and are Greatly over represented in high skill jobs (a result of higher average intelligence, not sexism. pic related)

There are fewer women in hard science because there are far fewer women at the higher end of the intelligence spectrum

>>2225613
there are more stupid women than stupid men
there are more average women than stupid men
there are more intelligent men than intelligent women