/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10489592
This is a seriously biased viewpoint though.
People invest in wind and solar too, are they not incentivized to spread misinfo then? There's a whole lot of scientists whose careers depend on this, can they not be expected to be biased?
There's a lot of politicians who depend on "renewable votes", can THEY be trusted blindly?

To be clear, I do believe in climate change, and also that something needs to be done about it, but you're still painting an incomplete picture here.
Also, last I checked, the predicted ocean level increases are in the inches/decade order of magnitude, so it's not like we're at death's door.