/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16197446
yes.

Observe, that 0.0 is no more precise a statement than 0.000, or 0.00... . Indeed, no matter how many decimals, the nothingness has perfect precision. Indeed, technically we shouldn't even have a symbol 0, that is already more than nothing.

Now, observe the infinite. as we add more digits we are not gaining any precision. Were not approaching any limit adding more digits. Indeed, no matter how many digits we add, we'll never get a precise value for infinity.

So, alas.
No matter how many digits we add to nothing, its precision is perfect.
No matter how many digits we add to the infinite,
there is no precision at all, no restful respite at a defined position on the number line.

Nothingness and infiniteness comes before number. If we only have two components, nothingness and infinite how can we get something inbetween, the unity.

We find that by forming a quaternary with the infinite and nothing. A balance between these opposing forces, the ouroboros operator.
[math]0 \circlearrowleft \infty = \{\}[/math]

the continuum, the proper notion of 'the empty set' the true basis of set theory derived from first principles.

by performing the ouroboros operator on two continuums, they fractally nest, bequeathing the unity.

[math]0 \circlearrowleft \infty \circlearrowleft 0 \circlearrowleft \infty = \{\{\}\} = 1[/math]

thus forming the the basis of the polynumber system, the true box math

>>16066168
under MMP your qualms are satiated, for its mathematically demonstrated the universe is composed of the infinite nothingness

>>15661134
Forgot pic

>>15602118
well said. No matter how many digits you add, you'll never get a precise answer.

MMP forms the continuum directly from this assertion, and also that 0 is its inverse. Without adding any digits, you have perfect precision

>>15552767
>>15552884
Reality is construed by the intermixing of the infinite and the nothingness

MMP makes this clear

>>15284152