[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.10959151 [View]
File: 613 KB, 2550x3300, Proof (2).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10959151

>>10959113
>I have a plan for a "survey with applications" paper called "Reals, Extended Reals, Hyperreals,and Surreals in the Modified Cosmological Model" (or something) but I probably won't write it this year.

oooo, sounds yummy, would definitely read. Post it up next year if you do get to, I'm trying to consolidate some stuff too.
Also, I do think your work has merit/interest in the field, but specifically pertaining to Riemann it always seems like you're changing the goal posts compared to the context Riemann asked.
I know you've been all through that before with the Dedekin(spelling) cuts discussions, and I don't mean to specifically rehash that here, but again that's why I think it's more fitting to the topic of hyper reals or other related topics in general.
Still, it doesn't hurt to bounce each other's work off the other, it raises awareness of both, gets people thinking critically about the problem, and one of us right ;)

> It shouldn't say that and if it did then there would be a glaring error at that part of the paper.
How then are you claiming that the division of 2 finite numbers is 0? You say x is a real near 0, y is a real near infinity, and that their division is 0.
"Incomparibly large" doesn't make that happen. In fact, they are comparable.
Sure it will be another really small number, even another x, or again infinitesimal, but not 0.

>> No.10591492 [View]
File: 613 KB, 2550x3300, Proof (2).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10591492

>>10591452
John's the other guy, I'm Ulysses.

>>10591456
On a side note, what is interesting is that during my research and earlier proof attempts, I had narrowed it down using inverse Fourier transforms. Using that technique, I was able to get to a point where I could show that they were all on the critical line or that there were an infinite number of solutions really close to the line. I'm talking at least 15 decimal places close, like a=.50000000000000001 or whatever. But that turned out to have to do with some artifacts from the trig functions I was using and a limit I was taking, and the method overall wasn't conclusive or refined enough for me to be happy with it.

>> No.10328319 [View]
File: 613 KB, 2550x3300, Proof (2).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10328319

Page 2

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]