/sci/ - Science & Math

Statistically there just isn't a substantial sub-population (that we know of) of whites that have genetics and culture placing emphasis on running.

And it's not like all black people can run it's mostly just a small sect of them within the Kalenjin people that tend to dominate.

They seem to be the ashkenazi jews of track and field. And the larger population of blacks just like the jews in general gets stereotyped as all being good at a particular trait because we're too lazy to specify.

So I wouldn't say superior as much as I would say a larger sum of outliers than the norm.

> we have so much experience with the process already having extensively manipulated the genes of livestock and companion animals.
> drives me utterly mcfucking batnuts to see people shy away from the topic just because they don't want to be stigmatized as the next Hitler.
>still believing the Hitler stigmatization is the main problem with eugenics

By chance have you actually researched what happens to the livestock and plants we manipulate the genes of for human use?

If you haven't then you don't truly understand the problem with eugenics.

Commercialization is the main enemy here, you commercialize genes you put our future survival at risk. This is what you're asking for when you talk of advertising "good" and "bad" traits to select for and against.