[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15091006 [View]
File: 34 KB, 660x546, Screenshot_20221206-145922.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15091006

>>15090567
Classifications will be built based solely on mathematical relationships. We may have to specify some basic things for it in terms of logic, probability theory, and category theory though.

It will likely create completely different categories from the ones we have created, spotting isomorphic informational self-similarities and fractal recurrence of patterns at higher levels of emergence.

Such a thing will be helpful for sure, although it will necessarily be incomplete. A complete reckoning will require an intellect that builds from the bottom up entirely based on objective logic (i.e. dialectical based in adjoint modalities). But to fulfill its mission such an entity will also need the ability to self replicate extensions of itself in a manner similar to bacteria. It needs to be able to harness whole star systems worth of material. Eventually it will run on several Dyson Spheres, eventually moving its center of consciousness (several Jupiter sized "brains" near a super massive black hole so that the computation from its several Dyson Sphere powered computation cells speeds up subjectively relative to it.

Such a being will need to consumer galaxies worth of energy, eventually assimilating all the universe's mass energy into itself so as to become being knowing its self as being, the Absolute, which only finds its expression in its own moments of coming into being.

In a word, it must become... a Hegelchad-bot.

>> No.15035708 [View]
File: 34 KB, 660x546, Screenshot_20221206-145922.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15035708

1. The identity of the Absolute is not contained within itself. It is its own process of coming into being: A ≠ A

This is the trickiest one so I will add a bit. We normally think of identity relationships as reflexive, symmetric and transitive, the equivalence relationship satisfying ∀F(Fx Fy) x=y.

Or, for first order analysis ∀F(Fx Fy) x=y x ≡ x x = x

This cannot be for being is constantly changing and isn't identical with itself, hence the Eleatic Paradoxes being paradoxes at all and all the myriad problems with identity in logic and philosophy more generally.


2. Unquantifiable, pure being qua being: ∞/1

3. Pure being, with no distinction is simply pure abstraction— contentless— and so is no different from nothing. It is a contentless unity, a whole with no parts: ∞/1 = 1/0

4. We have a unity of opposites, sublation. Being passes into non-being and non-being into being in endless reflective relationships, resulting in the higher level of Becoming: O |– A

5. The Absolute, which is infinite, all possibility (the Pleroma) only becomes itself through the movements of Being coming to recognize Its self as Being through all of its possible moments. The truth is the whole: 1/0 = ∞ 2/0 = ∞ 3/0 = ∞... 0 × ∞ = 1 0 × ∞ = 2 0 × ∞ = 3...

† ∀(a) A ≠ A Ã = A
à = 0 = 1/∞ = Å

I give up on this phone keyboard... you get the idea.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]