/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10476411
Phase III Clinicals and adoption by the EU isn't "on a whim"

>>10476496
Agreed, much misinformation is spread by advocates and shills. This is widely accepted truth. I should have worded this differently - "do Allopaths readily prescribe the herbal as part of their TLC recommendations" I guess I'm just bias because I come from the big city where round patients are shoved in square holes so quickly it's sickening. I think we have a slight misunderstanding; let me clarify. I'll put it as simple as I can - I'm trying to advocate against the physicians who overprescribe and underevaluate patients, who just so happen to find themselves in a specific medical school of thought here in the US. These same physicians are the ones who undermine the many effective non-invasive modes of therapy due to their origins, and also mud-sling them adding further stigma which is already very prevalent due to the advocates/shills mentioned earlier. It's true many of these are complimentary, few may stand alone with respect to conventional meds... But there are anons even in this thread who believe they have no place in modern medicine. That's my source of hostility. Apologies, this is my passion.

>>10476521
Ah, looks like I posted the wrong article for the invivo experimentation. There's one on pigs with bladder cancer taking it orally, but I can't find it unfortunately.

>>10476685
> nigga
Yes, listen to this man instead. Is that seriously how you chose to represent yourself? What is this, underage /sci/? Antibiotics are over prescribed, just ask the WHO.

>>10476698
That's not the problem, the problem is people are using "cough syrup" thinking it's going to cure their cough, when really it's just an analgesic. Probably because it's marketed as "cough syrup".. ITT: We miss the point.

>>10476725
If you never heard of it, you haven't been in med very long. At least not in the US, according to other anons. It's literally the first Google search result "MD vs DO" (pic relate)