/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9018123
>not peer-reviewed, and claims it is due to institutional bias, similar to that of creationists
>published by a "racial realist" for "racial realists," just like creationist "research journals"
>website is pretty much "alternative facts," along the lines of the DI's many ID websites
Again, I see little difference between this and creationist pseudoscience. No amount of "hurr" will make me back down from this.

>racism
this is pure anti-blackism at this point

how can it be otherwise
native americans don't exist basically (other than peruvians i guess, but who cares about them)
hispanics are mostly white
muslims are white (islam isn't a race anyway :^)
australians barely exist
asians are actually fine by /pol/ standards