/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15156753
Yes, objects fall at an agreed upon average of 9.8 m/s/s the effect is not in contention, the cause is:
https://youtu.be/kcFnoY0lVTI

The cause of the downward accelerative force is electrostatics which is provable; density and buoyancy sort the rest out. Gravity is not needed, is stupid, and doesn’t even hold up conceptually or theoretically

>Sun’s gravity is strong enough to keep all planets including Pluto in orbit and comets on an exactly repeating cycles..
>..yet it’s too weak to even tug at the moon a little bit to pull it out of earth’s cyclical orbit even slightly enough so that it would be at all noticeable over time.

Just as nonsensical as earth’s gravity being strong enough to hold the moon in perfectly cyclical orbit yet too weak to prevent a butterfly from overcoming all of the gravity generated by an entire planet with a single flap of its little wings. It’s just stupid and only held up by bullshit abstract equations that don’t describe reality.

Inb4 you continue to regurgitate more of your religious dogma about how your deified force of gravity is immune to all logic and reason bc you have a math formula you think can magically bend space and time to fit your delusions. Nobody cares.

We can manipulate the electrostatics of an object to make it float or sink. When we manipulate an independent variable to prove the cause, that’s called science. Claiming that the downward accelerative force is caused by electrostatics is testable. We cannot however manipulate gravity bc it is literally impossible to manipulate the bending and warping of space-time to see if it is actually the cause of the downward accelerative force. Those claiming gravity to be the cause of the downward accelerative force are using pseudoscience BY DEFINITION since gravity cannot be manipulated and therefore cannot be scientifically proven as the cause of any earthly phenomenon