/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16020992
>EXACTLY how it works
Exactly how it works is my 2013 solution to classical electrogravity.

Developing anti-gravity will be an application of a working theory of classical electrogravity (which I developed in 2013.) This is why "hypersonic missiles" suddenly popped up all over the place around 2015: it was due to my conceptual breakthrough.

>>15818461

>>15784049
>How do they work?

>>15067617
>my 2013 solution to classical electrogravity.
It was due to this conceptual hurdle I overcame in 2013 that everyone started talking about "hypersonic missiles" around 2015.

Top military leader says China’s hypersonic missile test ‘went around the world’
https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/17/politics/john-hyten-china-hypersonic-weapons-test/index.html

>>15067617
>my 2013 solution to classical electrogravity.
It was due to this conceptual hurdle I overcame in 2013 that everyone started talking about "hypersonic missiles" around 2015.

Top military leader says China’s hypersonic missile test ‘went around the world’
https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/17/politics/john-hyten-china-hypersonic-weapons-test/index.html

>>14768795
>his stuff isn’t even really science,
You'll notice that no one was talking about hypersonic missiles before they suddenly appeared in late stage field testing around 2016-ish. This is due to my 2013 solution to classical electrogravity.

>>12679768
>what would happen if someone discovers anti-gravity technology?
Everyone on 4chan would call him a schizo and all the other professional academics that didn't discover it would shit on whomever had.

All of this comes from my 2013 solution to electrogravity.

I solved classical electrogravity in 2013 so they should be able to build flying saucers now.

We do have it since I solved classical electrogravity in 2013. It's being kept secret by my enemies who thought if I was going to be the Messiah then it would be because I would come up with some new way to smoke crack and suck dick or something like that, or maybe because I would be magical, and who discounted a priori my scientific work and betrayed me.

If you can solve for classical electrogravity, which means to solve for the metric as a function of the electric potential, then you could make anti-gravity with an electrical antenna. I solved this in 2013.

Yes, this is already possible since I solved classical electrogravity in 2013.

Everyone has heard of the AdS/CFT "holographic duality" by which physics on a bulk determines physics on a surface, and vice versa. My main new idea was to have a surface sandwiched between two bulks. Usually when they look at AdS/CFT, they just imagine a surface at the end of one bulk. This is reflected in what RS have done. Pic related, I said, "Let there be two semi-infinite 5D bulks with a 4D surface of tangency."

https://vixra.org/author/jonathan_w_tooker

>>12167655
but IUT is garbage though. the unit cell is the good stuff.

Electrogravity missiles aren't necessarily ballistic so shooting them down is much harder than shooting down a ballistic missile.

This is also one of the top three most important ones.

There is a fake copy of the USA built somewhere on the Earth, probably in Antarctica but maybe in northern Canada, Siberia, or on a barge in the Ocean. It is an evil place. Simulation theory's meme relates to the living in a place that looks like the USA, and may legally be an annex of the USA, but is not on the North American continent. This is one reason why they have to suppress my discovery of electrogravity. If people get flying cars, they aren't going to be fooling anyone any more. Since the $35T missing from the Pentagon budget was used to build that place, they don't want to let me burn that $35T with the four page paper I wrote about electrogravity in 2013, pic related.

I will exterminate everyone I find there. All their little beloved children that the moved to the fake zone thinking it would survive a nuclear war: I am going to exterminate them with maximum prejudice.