/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2310223
then don't use it.

Easy huh?
See? we won't bother you about it.


it's a little frighting how this all sounds like atheists and theists arguing huh?

finally...the technology to rebuild cutfags.

Praise be to the engineers.

cutfags....the poor devils

>>2180270

well you got me there...i'm no specialist on such manners and you must obviously have some knack for it.

I will however note that even moderate failures in the flight of an asteroid mining mission could halt the operation and result in no return on investment. It's true.
Terrestrial ventures could suffer even several catastrophic failures (such as the collapse of a mine shaft killing and possibly trapping the crew) that can ALSO halt the operation and result in no return on investment.
let's send some proper surveying stuff out that a way first so you can actually see what you're passing up eh?

no as such no...more like it's probably easier taking a 3G launch, spend 9 months in peace and quiet, and then come back with the gross national product of some off in the wall country appeals to me is all...
I'm not the only one.

to be blunt, it ain't about the metal...or the dollars

it's having the sense of mind to get our species off this blighted mud ball WHILE we have the tech AND a horde of crazy motherfuckers WILLING to beat a path just for the opportunity to try it.

we need to get more experience out there and it will take many lives and tons of assets, but i fail to see how it can not be of any benefit currently.

you don't get ANY returns at all if you refuse to try and insist on clinging to mother's hem and wailing about lost pennies.

obviously it's an orange...everyone knows a vest doesn't have any sleeves, right?

you just need one rocket...
and a really long hose and a huge ass water pump

>>1975864

>>1967296
Whoa. I never thought about that. Awesome...

>>1911005
WIN.