/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12606842
>stubborn
>racist
>watches anime
>showers never
>avoids talking to people
>easily frightened
>makes angry posts online

LITERALLY me. Sciencechads, RISE UP.

>>12533735
>work for the MIC
Would be cool to build something commercially that blows up "terrorists" lmao.

>>11942344
Lanklets btfo

>>11903752
I cum laude inside ur mom faggot

>>11870852
Spread the word brother

>>11839979
>tipped my surgeon 30% before my appendectomy
>he added 5 more inches to my cock while he was down there

>Geomagnetic Effects on Earth's Biology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCqQkyWAGjU

>>11650504
Dyson spheres are fucking trivial for any civilization that doesn't have to deal with babysitting some third world niggers.

>>11612967
It doesn't matter. As soon as egg is fetilized, it becomes a new individual which is a member of the human species. The question whether it has any consciousness or experience is a red herring used by pro-abortionists to justify the abortion. Ask yourself the question if it is OK to murder a person that is unconscious or asleep in a state that is not REM.

Abortion is murder, because you're ending the existence of a member of your own species. All the other arguments are vapid, low-IQ attempts at justifying murder.

>>11605216
Now do this for race

>>11597781
Watson was right though

The only people who should pay taxes are the companies that pollute

>>11041669
based and true

>Tfw 6'3" whilst leaning diagonally using the taxicab metric.

>>10373873
>implying I'm not the capitalist
how's that PhD going, "functional" ANALyst? hurry up, can't wait to hire you as a literal janny so you can clean all the shit in Pajeet's office

>>10348732
Fucking. Epic.

If anthropomorphic climate change exists, it's anthropomorphic hence man made.
If anthropomorphic climate change doesn't exist, it's a man-made hoax hence man made.
In all cases, anthropomorphic climate change is man made.

>>10296733
At least a doctor would have a degree

>>10195160
>post yfw the great filler is birth control

>be 31 year old neet high school dropout brainlet
>wake up at 9pm
>creep to the utility closet where parents hide the hydrocodone bottle
>pop four of them
>go to the kitchen and see what was for dinner
>it was the good jalapeno and cheddar hot dogs
>eat all five of them that are left over
>go to the bathroom and dump out a big load of sloppy unhealthy shit
>return to my room and browse 4chan in bed until they woke up in the morning and I go back to sleep

>>10100057
*dab*

*dab dabdabdab dab dabdab* *dab dab dabdab dabdabdabdabdab dab dabdab*

*dab*

*dab dab*

*dabdabdabdabdabdabdab dab dab dabdabdabdabdab dabdab dabdabdabdabdabdab*

*dab dab*

So you want to know if race is a biological classification?
Well where would race fit into the lineian hierarchy? Somewhere underneath species, possibly analogous to subspeicies, possibly homologous to genetic clusters population ecogeological traits .
Race is a nonscientific term, the quality this category has is resemblance, black skin, big dick, came from the same place, ect) so these resemblances are taken by a community of people who using language figure out that these like individuals should be called"black"
Now a race has been socially constructed. All it's members are black and they share there identity, parts of there culture because quality of the race, like soul food.
So a race is a social construct from shared space, culture, and Synapomorphic Ecogeological clades that vary in breadth from a single population pygmies to every African in Africa. Race constructed by meaning making,semiosis and particularly lanague allow race to devolp from social interaction, for some there nation state becomes a part of their race.
So does race have and place in systematics? I doubt it, here's why
It is constructed from unscientific concepts. Race can include many different population,the boundaries are not drawn for evolutionary relation, the are drawn based on resemblance. Systematics is based on biological relationship,. "
Race is based on fuzzy "race" has no place then the taxonmic nomenclature. Good old species, populations variant, type.
Of course the best way to figure out that relation is phylogenetic systematics, and cladistics.

Race is not a biological quality, it is contradictory to the nomenclature.

> hereditary phenotypical differences in both visible traits and behavioral patterns?
With systematics and evolution, and proper terminology
> subspecial taxonomy similar to the classifications of breeds in dogs for people?
We already had that, it's called people's, like the twa or the Apache, the problem is global capitalism is making us all the same.