/sci/ - Science & Math

/sci/ pls I need your help
<span class="math">\frac{d}{dx}\int_{\frac{1}{x}}^{\sqrt{x}}sint^2\,dt[/spoiler]
seems impossible, but I have faith in you <span class="math">:3[/spoiler]

> Did Newton discover or invent Calculus?

No. Leibniz discovered or invented Calculus

>tfw I failed calculus I
>tfw I don't think I'll be able to push trough the rest of the exam seeing how I'm a total failure
>goodbye /sci/ it's been nice knowing you

Not all philosophy boils down to "you can't know nuffin" nonsense

>>6136384
Get on my level, you filthy Britbong.

mathematics and philosophy

>>5793036
>No calc

Cunt say that to my face not online and see what happens

The more I learn, the more I feel that math is a religion.

Ask a christian what it means to be christian and you'll get a poor answer, the same is true regarding mathematicians (they are blinded by their own enterprise).

ITT: any pdf material you'd recommend for someone trying to study non standard analysis but has no real access to said resources?

I'm looking to go to community college with hopes of then continuing to go to college for 2 years to complete a bachelors in engineering.

In the process of learning about my local community college, I learned that the first math course that would contribute to an engineering associates degree is Calculus 1.

Being your typical underachieving too smart for his own good high school kid, I took the bear minimum of classes and their respective difficulties. This to say I only went far enough in math to take Algebra 2.

Now I'm in a position where I don't want to spend a bunch of money on classes that will not benefit me, but of which I still need the knowledge from.

And so I am here with a question.

What would be the best way to learn Trigonometry and/or Pre-Calculus?

monads were ahead of their time.

actually, i think its like zfc, you can underline it with more things then you use in practical application.

can we talk about meta-physics /sci/?

Where would I find lesser-known, relatively unimportant unsolved mathematical problems to try?

Does anyone know anything about Monads?

>>4723760

no, because calculus was invented by me
pic related

>>4126989
>>4126983
>>4126998
Liebz

hello /sci/

This is a longshot, but I figure it's worth a try.
A while back, I remember stumbling upon a b&w clip on youtube. From what I recall, it was in some 40s/50s lecture hall and there was a very famous scientist (possibly some social sciences, or a philosopher) speaking about how people should always try to set their marks far higher than their actual goals so if they fall short they still succeed, or something like that. The only other things I remember are that the speaker had a very strong foreign accent and this was one of those youtube videos with hundreds of thousands (maybe millions) of views. I've been trying to find it for the past hour, but no luck...

Anyone have any idea what I'm talking about?

Leibniz unrelated

>>3517069
> The correct answer is that 0.00...0001 is not a valid polynomial (of digits). It is not a defined decimal expansion of a Real Number.

> If you want to talk about non-Real Numbers which exist on the number line, then you first need to present your new mathematics.

>>present your new mathematics.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_standard_analysis

>>3509991

a challenger appears

>>3241191

You must have forgotten about this beast of a man.

>>2576003
nou
lrn2publish

Don't mind me guys, just being smarter than you ever were.

>>2479938
Take that shit back motherfucker