/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10537667
>I think it says alot about you
>>10537639
>Boy, you little ugly repulsive leftist black.
>>10537556
>You know, your dumb insecurity
ITT: white niggers triggered

The evidence is clear and abundant.
Whether you are a radical Muslim extremist who believes fags should be stoned to death, or a tendie-munching neckbeard praying fervently for the day of the rope, you have something in common: low cognitive ability, which, as you have always maintained, is genetic.

>I'll tell you why, because the truth is that its not a simple "liberal" vs "conservative" thing
Interesting you can perceive all these nuances in this case, but still argue doggedly in favor of a simple "black" vs "white" thing.
It's as if you can't see the inconsistency in your appraisal of the research.
Lower cognitive ability.

>who had the highest IQ, the rich elite monarchist (conservatives) or the peasant revolutionaries (Liberal)?
I could ask you a question in return: re the American revolution, who had the highest IQ, the rich conservative elite monarchy, or the founding fathers of the United States (who embraced an ultra-liberal concept of self-governance)?
At any rate, both cases are really irrelevant to the discussion at hand; we are talking about modern conservatives, who prove themselves brainlets because they're motivated by bigotry and their holy books.