/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11192223
>It’s very difficult to prove anything about earth being round is fake, because it is round.
If that was the case, this debate wouldn't still be happening in 2019.
>Because watching the Earth-Moon system spin around for months from the outside wouldn’t give us any scientific knowledge? We put satellites up there to image earth, so they’re only placed so far away.
Such footage would show your model in all its physical glory. Why have CGI when we have the real thing? It would get even more people interested and excited about space. It's excellent marketing for NASA.
>Why would we? It’d be nice, but it’s not a pressing concern.
Because it's very valuable footage - it's important for humanity to see where we live at that scale. It shows the power of science, and the intelligence of those in the past who modelled our reality correctly. What we actually get from NASA is utterly pathetic. Gif related. Speechless...
>Literally one astronaut answering questions. Not comparable to the millions and millions of dollars involved in launching a lander onto the moon with a high-definition video camera that never stops recording and transmitting video of earth in the sky.
Why was she arguing against flat earth in the first place if it's not a threat? There was a period of time where NASA astronauts were all over the place in the media trying to convince everyone the earth isn't flat. Just youtube "astronauts flat earth". Why do they feel the need to convince people in that way? They can easily afford a few million to get high quality footage.
>A camera so far away that it can see the whole solar system would render the planets as little specs at the very best, and you’d call it fake anyway. Missions are launched to gather data
At least capture the sun, moon and earth in their complete orbits. This doesn't exist. Globeshits deserve this footage more than us, it's 2019 for goodness sake.
>They advance space technology and exploration
Name a recent advance.

>>10840033
This is real?

>>10136380
Watch this and relax. It's real, we landed on this.

>>9911084
Like this?

>>9906563
Awkward...

>>9884668
This.

>>9835034
Oh, so THAT'S why the CGI is so shit.

>>9700122
I bet you think this is real.

How could any real scientist question NASA's beautiful and REALISTIC imagery? Pic damn well related. Moon hoaxers and flat earthers BTFO, you're welcome, now leave science to the adults please or go play Kerbal Space Program and learn something (WARNING: Requires a mature brain). Maybe you still have the chance to evolve into an adult, we're all waiting.

>>9621277

>Globecuck thinks he's spinning 1000mph on a ball that's travelling 66,600mph around the sun, and the sun is travelling 500,000mph around the galaxy, and the galaxy is travelling 1.5 million mph

Learn some physics kid. Oh wait, that's what they teach you in physics? What a load of fucking brainlets.

>I-it's real NASA said so

>>9503109

Okay Mr Wobbler, why don't we feel this wobble? Oh it's too minute for us to sense? Thought so. But it's not minute enough to show different areas of the moon?

If the moon is spherical, would you then believe pic related is real footage of the dark side of the moon? (It's official footage from NASA).

Time to get out of your sci-fi bubbles brainlets and base your reasoning on actual observable reality, not theoretical bullshit and SpaceX green screens.

Water does not curve around the exterior of shapes.

Air cannot co-exist next to a vacuum without a solid barrier.

These two things alone BTFO the globe model. Extremely simple scientific facts that you cannot ignore.

spathe ith real look nasa done video of moony

>>9465685

>>9097380
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/11924