/sci/ - Science & Math

Graduate school is for dumb smart people who weren't good enough for industry and pretend that they're actually too good for it to save face.

Math & Physics degrees are romanticized, extremely.

For your career, be a large fish in a small pond.

For your personal growth, be a small fish in a large pond.

>>10751882
>come home
>media doesn't give one fuck about mars
>entire story is about omg he said nigger
>pic related

>>10658093
I am saying that the efficiency to digest substances varies from person to person. It takes an awful long time for concentrated sulfuric acid to digest meat but the human stomach does it in a few hours because it has the proper enzymes. If you don't have the proper enzymes then your stomach won't be able to break down the food properly to access the nutrients. They don't take into account which enzymes you have in your body when they make the food labels. Therefore, if your body does not produce the proper enzyme, you will have difficulty processing certain foods meaning that 2000 calories of meat may only be 1900 for you. Then you will say "so people will lose weight" and that would be true if sugar wasn't easy to digest. Food is so widely available that you can change your diet very easily so people who can't drink something like milk turn to other alternatives like juices. Those are much easier to digest but they also increase your insulin resistance which leads to fat gain more rapidly. I don't attack thermodynamics but I will disagree with the notion that CiCo is too simple to explain fat loss and fat gain.
>>10658105
>whats the point
To further add to my point that labelled caloric content does not mean that it will be converted to ATP by the body. Some people are predisposed to digest some food sources better than others. Meaning that counting calories won't be as simple as CiCo. I know my post was hard to follow but I mainly wanted to say that reducing fat gain and fat loss to CiCo is too simple.

As for the study, I guess I should have precised refined sugar but lets assume carbohydrates because you were kind enough to spoonfeed me your source. It is a nice study that sort of contradicts what I said however, it does not provide me with the actual diet. In order to be in ketogenic state you must consume ~50g of carbohydrates or less. I also never addresses this point because I didn't really think that anyone would reply to my post but as with