/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9353193
> Asians were colonized but managed to retain there high IQ's. Also if I'm not mistaken there were slaves in ancient rome who were tutors to the children of their masters.
Colonization=/=indentured servitude=/= chattel slavery
But yeah, we can't blame everything one slavery though.

>I wouldn't call them high, I just no what kind of societies whites produce. There are other reason than IQ to be opposed to non-white immigration. Whites are more favorable to free speech for instance here in the US. And IQ is extremely predictive of things like criminality and unintended pregnancies.
Conceding all this to be correct, would an IQ barrier be just, if not more effective?
>receive the cream of the crop of the 3rd world.
>IQ test is best predictive system, so we can have a high certainty that they will be model citizens and suitable for integration.

>Acknowledge that diverse societies are harmful to social capital and allow people to live with their own. Remember these open border enthusiast are the aggressors, not I. They're pushing for radical and fundamental changes of white nations.
I can agree with you on the principle of right to association. So was the whole IQ debate started to defend this principle? I mean if you don't want anyone stepping on your snake, and want to be with people like yourself to achieve this, I wouldn't fault you tbhfampai (given the racial environment in the West atm).

>Sure, but practice what you preach. Are you prepared to live in a society where the averge IQ is 70?
>implying I haven't for my entire life