[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.3181633 [View]
File: 580 KB, 2048x1024, earth sphere texture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3181633

you are now realizing that every sentient race in the universe that lives on a rocky planet and is carbon based will have fossil fuels.
it's all hydrocarbons once you heat and compress it for a few million years
and you can bet those sentient species will not be the "first wave" of creatures on their planet

and let's face it, carbon based life forms are probably pretty damn common

>> No.1042054 [View]
File: 580 KB, 2048x1024, earth sphere texture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1042054

what is your stance on the climate change debate?

A) humans are a major contributor to climate change, if not the sole contributor, and immediate action must be taken to prevent a runaway greenhouse.

B) humans are a pretty good contributor, but other forces might overshadow us. action now is nice, but not critical

C) the data is inconclusive either way

D) humans are a minor contributor, and while action might be necessary later on, it's not critical right now.

E) humans contribute in an infinitesimal way, and the current controversy is drawn from erroneous conclusions from weak data. Something else is causing it.

F) other (please specify)


not a troll thread, just curious how /sci/ breaks down on this

>> No.1029330 [View]
File: 580 KB, 2048x1024, earth sphere texture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1029330

hey
you
yeah you
what is your stance on the climate change debate?

A) humans are a major contributor to climate change, if not the sole contributor, and immediate action must be taken to prevent a runaway greenhouse.

B) humans are a pretty good contributor, but other forces might overshadow us. action now is nice, but not critical

C) the data is inconclusive either way

D) humans are a minor contributor, and while action might be necessary later on, it's not critical right now.

E) humans contribute in an infinitesimal way, and the current controversy is drawn from erroneous conclusions from weak data. Something else is causing it.

F) other (please specify)


not a troll thread, just curious how /sci/ breaks down on this

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]