/sci/ - Science & Math

OK, let's simplify this.

Astronaut A on Spaceship A, is floating in inter-galactic space, nothing for a gazillion light years around EXCEPT another astronaut, Astronaut B in Spaceship B. They simonize their clocks, then A goes blasting away as fast as his ship can go, which is fast enough for relativistic effects.

He flies away for a few years, his time, turns and comes back.

Does B's clock show more time has passed? If so, it seems there is a preferred frame of reference. Do the clocks show the same time has passed? Then what happened to those relativistic time dilation effects?

squ'eh?

got tested, 89 IQ with standard deviation 10

>>4983153

>quadrupling of muscle mass in mice

My body is not ready.

Science isnt real

God created all living things and is responsible for all mechanical, and microscopic things

prove me wrong, fags

I tried to but flying in space is harder than I thought.

>>3561891

He did make the spacecraft plausible, though. He even got Charles Pellegrino to write up some report telling the 3D people how to make it properly scientifically-accurate.

We are all happy and hope SpaceX gets more of the sweet government money (because everyone else that would get it really sucks) but I don't think there is anything for us to discuss here. Consensus is boring.

>>3307016
Epic hamster man when will you make a space habitat?

>>3161564

Hey /sci/, how would you predict the thermodynamic properties of a 4-component mixture from binary data? My guess is to treat two binary mixtures as single chemicals, then combine them, basically forming a pseudo-binary mixture. This would reduce the number of chemicals from four to two. Would this be a valid strategy?

>>939125
We already have, OP.

Also: Bearstronauts.