/sci/ - Science & Math

>>	Anonymous Thu Apr 20 11:00:58 2017 No.8841957 [View] File: 158 KB, 499x339, fas.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>8841933

>>	Anonymous Wed Feb 15 11:17:09 2017 No.8676691 [View] File: 158 KB, 499x339, 1483508377232.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Jan 22 15:46:08 2017 No.8621947 [View]
File: 158 KB, 499x339, 1483508377232.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Here's the deal OP.

A large group of sci (of which a good number ain't really serious when they say it) will tell you Stewart is a terrible book and refer you to other popular works.

While Stewart is not as rigorous as those other works, it doesn't mean it has no value and wont teach you Calculus.

I'd say Stewart is good. Although it is long and repetitive, it gets the point across after each chapter.

So if you don't feel quite ready to tackle the most rigorous textbooks, try Stewart.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

Navigation
View posts	[+24]	[+48]	[+96]

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search: