/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3108982

Is monotheism a religion?

>>2985125

You figured me out, I got into economics because I want to rip people off and steal everyones money.

>>2985133

Thank you for acknowleding scarcity will still exist. While I think material scarcity cannot be plausibly avoided, I appreciate that you post-scarcity people can at least acknowledge that scarcity exists, in many forms.

>>2970310

>>2932282

>mfw when after one year you completely destroy your body and nervous system and become paralyzed.

This reminds me of one time I heard about a notion of someone being both brain dead and paraplegic. I couldnt stop laughing. Thats like the funniest idea Ive ever heard of. Weirded everyone I know out.

>>2903636
This...has to be some sort of joke...

>>2873021
If it hurts, then you're doing something wrong.

>The evidence for determinism is in its internal symmetry
>evidence
>internal symmetry

LOL.

>It holds as a theory

except for the fact that you don't have any evidence for it, except "it's consistent with itself!"

>as far as I know that's the very basis for proper science.

It isn't. If it can't be tested, it's not a theory, and doesn't belong in science. They really do need to make a /phi/ board.

>>2844395

>implying it's not an implied mfw upon hearing that
>implying I would waste my life majoring in anthropology

Did you really have to make another thread?

Do you REALLY have to ask that question?

>doesn't understand entropy

>>2822269
>hey /sci/ this fag are

I guess he's not the only one with "retarded words."

>>2805220
Then how does one discern things in a "spiritual manner?" How is your method different from those of potentially other religions?

>>2802038
Like -what-? And the poster which you linked pointed out the problem with using terms like "good" and "bad", "evil," etc., as they're relative.

>>2791462
>>2791459
Really? Man, you guys are gullible as fuck.

>you know it in your heart

Though disappointed, I'm not in the least bit surprised.

Such is life in the Zone.

>magic

Does the Law of Conservation of Mass not apply to Dark Matter?

Please, remind me why math isn't a Jewish pseudoscience, consisting of abstraction and casuistry, that has nothing to do with empirical.

Please, stop.

What most of you fail to realize or conclude is there is no logical answer. There is no Creator. Because it is infinitely recursive. The net energy of the universe is 0 folks. the universe is just a temporary unbalance of forces. learn about quantum fluctuations.

>drop ball on the moon
>it floats
>mon visage

>the massive, knotted dick in-between her thighs

wat.