/sci/ - Science & Math

Simulation showing (a part of) how it went down: https://a.cockfile.com/nlDU7N.mp4

>>11545663
>>11545667
>>11545763

> It is not economically friendly, nor important for the world to forgo meat as we have a surplus of retarded niggers on this planet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubGzbj59_Xs

> How to go through paywall articles:
https://mg.scihub.ltd/

And finally,

> FREE EXTRA BONUS LINKS:
https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/70/3/543s/4714998
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12936959
https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/78/3/633S/4690005
https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/82/2/327/4862944
https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/abcs-of-nutrition/vitamin-a-on-trial-does-vitamin-a-cause-osteoporosis/

>>11519017
0.99, or 0.999999, or 0.9999999999999999999, or an infinite number of 9s if you want, isn't 1. No matter how many 9s you put in, it will never be 1.

>>11272044
>HEY JANNY WATCH THIS BRPRRFRAAAAAAAAAAAAAP PRT BLARPRP NOW CLEAN THAT SHIT
>Hey, the evolution and culling of fecal bacteria populations is science!

Okay space rocket believers (those of you who believe they move in space), if you do this experiment:

>Launch rockets from sea level
>record the distance they travel
>Launch identical rockets in identical numbers from Mount Everest
>record the distance they travel
>compare the distances travelled by the rockets; the sea-level launches vs the Everest launches

Oops, you discover that the rockets launched from Everest -- where there's less atmosphere (in other words closer to a vacuum) -- don't travel as far, as the ones launched from sea level.

>(of course, for a fair comparison the rockets from both sea-level and from Everest must be launched at the same angle, as close to 100% vertical as possible)

For an even more dramatic difference, go up in a super high altitude balloon or a MiG 31 or SR71 and launch the same rockets from that.

For an EVEN more dramatic difference, teleport yourself into space and launch the rockets there... ooops, they don't travel anywhere at all.

>>10329666
oh so you're also a pol nutjob that just wanted to hear his beliefs confirmed.
abandon thread

>>9820024
I've actually heard that microdosing amphetamine is pretty beneficial
Which would have in fact pretty similar effects to microdosing meth
The major factor is in fact the biological life of meth which is twice as long
I myself only use LSD-25 once in a while