[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9790491 [View]
File: 65 KB, 744x531, 1354754572135.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9790491

>>9790405
Because students are discouraged from studying outside their niche.

>> No.6149671 [View]
File: 65 KB, 744x531, i_dont_give_a_shit_about_your_mountain.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6149671

>math

>> No.5322995 [View]
File: 65 KB, 744x531, mathlandscape.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5322995

I need to think about measures on finite measures on an event set, and I don't know how.

I'm willing to consider measures on a subset of the finite measures on finite sets, to start, but I can't do that, either. :(

Help

>> No.5268771 [View]
File: 65 KB, 744x531, mathlandscape.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5268771

I need to integrate over all continuous single-real-valued functions that integrate to 1

Is a metric on the function set the only thing i need to evaluate such an integral? How will the integral vary by choice of the distance metric?

Any things you can link me to would be appreciated

>> No.5218491 [View]
File: 65 KB, 744x531, mathlandscape.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5218491

I have a very pretty concave [down] function and I want to find it's zeros as efficiently as possible

Should I use a binary search, or newton's method? When would one be better than the other? Any other ideas?

There's no finding a closed form for these roots, btw..

Thanks

>> No.4794617 [View]
File: 65 KB, 744x531, i_dont_give_a_shit_about_your_mountain.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4794617

>Oh I'm sorry, you must have confused me with someone who gives a shit about your branch of mathematics.

How I see further discussions with this guy going.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]