/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7420861
Relativity* Not universe

/sci/ I just had a thought while I was in the shower, black holes are potentially moving at a constant speed beyond the event horizon, which brought me to how our minimal constant could be applied; the planck ofc. Now if a photon could reach a point of operating in there the natural course a star reaching critical mass that the planck could achieve a superlative quality that made the photon 'bounce' back and fourth, but like a spiral that once it went one rotation clockwise around it flipped and started going counter clockwise and then again clockwise etc etc
But the real kicker is how there could be a structure with so much energy that it attracts mass beyond the point of polarization

tl;dr: OP has suspicion that single photon creates black hole

>>6343493
WHAT HAPPEN TO 1 AND 2?

>>6073626
>mfw 15 word essay in graph theory due tomorrow and I haven't even started.

>>5794249
I'm not OP but
>mfw amerindian but mom's family is part spaniard with balding males.

>>5707853
and made of fucking legos too!

>>5701652
>tfw I am too

I always thought dx was just notation to say what you were doing and then the lecturer says something about integrate and something chain rule we cancel dx by putting dx here and crossing it out, obviously.

I have no idea what happened and forgot to ask later. I feel violated and lost.

1st dimensional is an infinite perspective of 0 dimensional
2 Dimensional is an infinite perspective of 1 dimensional
3 Dimensional is an infinite perspective of 2 dimensional
4th Dimensional is infinite perspective of 3rd dimensional
0 Dimensional is infinite perspective of 4th dimensional

Discuss.

>>5543108

>>4934415
>And you know what? Most academicians still do not understand how and why science works. And accordingly, kids never learn in school the difference between science and religion. They are simply expected to blindly believe what the teacher tells without ever having explained what distinguishes him from a religious preacher.

This is true, and it makes me sad.

>>2884442
> "a very freedom-oriented constitution"
> patriot act
> victory act
> pre-election promise to close gitmo, "haha, i lied fuckers"
> diebold voting machines
> ad infinitum

congrats on being the first tripfag i've had to filter on /sci/

Wolfram is clueluess
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=a^2*a^x%3Db^x%2Bc

Gravity has negative energy.
We call this "potential energy," but really imagine objects trading particles back and forth (like photons). They would eventually repel because each bounce causes them to push away. But the gravatons have negative energy, so when they 'bounce' back and forth (emitting absorbing etc) they actually get closer, hence gravity sucks things.
Think about it, things don't inherently have potential energy, they need another object to relate to in order to determine how much "potential energy" it has.

But that's just like, my opinion, man.