/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15938887
Or perhaps I'm wondering why you would come to a messaging board and not be prepared to attempt the issues of discorse.

Most of these discussions are semantic ones.
I comprehend Reality and Truth as you define them, and I'm not refuting that, but social truths (As I understand them) are not objective truths because they do not exist invariably, they are objective in that they exist however and they have precedence and objectivity where they do exist, but they are malleable and subject to change and only occur in the context of enviroment, a symptom of enviroment if you will. If reality was otherwise one dimensional it would be irrefutable, the fact is subjectivivity in the perception of reality is detrimental to prevent the kinds of dogmatic scientific/religious or otherwise idealogical one world order hellscapes, as such behaviours alternative to a particular social climate are necesarry (This is not to say they are any more or less important then any other course of behaviour)

Terence Mckenne has a great bit about going schizophrenic for a few months, the point being that everyone can experience so called insane states of mind and still return to themselves, that the full range of human capacity is available to all of us, and in that claim no one is truly "Special". It's a matter of will, to go into these alternate states of mind for the value they possess in granting oneself a wider perspective on the way things work.

How can anyone make any claims to understand autistic, schizophrenic, or any other alternative behaviours if they have not experienced these states of mind for themselves? Particularly when these individuals don't use language the way most people do. To recomend a course of action (*Treatment) from this state of ignorance is a disasterous affair, and rather then try and constantly correct and edify these things why not find a place for them to exist? Because objectively these people and these states of mind will continue to exist >