/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15734587

>>15649295
>an action potential

Did academia teach you this phrase?

What is good and evil, scientifically? We've been on about this subject for years, surely there's something scientific we can say about it. There is always grounds for a good or evil judgement. Even if the concept is a subjective process, it has an objective root - to claim something is good requires certain stimulus - if this is double edged what is the central source?

Cum on me PLESE I need it now. I'm gonna faaaaaaaart tehehehhehee

But seriously though this thread belongs on
>>>/x/

>>15557287
You are too retarded.

Science is not social, it's rather anti-social or intrinsic plotting of something with intent to carry something out. In is confused in today's world that science is social, that the carrying out part is science when in reality it is what science produces. Science is a process, not a protocol. Science is enjoyable and produces good information about scenes or themes. There is no conglomerate science, there are only processions. When we say that science has achieved something, it should be thought that it is actually someone who has achieved something using science.

If a jet is fit with a gear that makes it complete an array of complex turns while flying at high speed allow it to leverage itself enough upright to simply fly into space? Answer me fagpot pseuds. All of you stupid. You don't even into maffs properly.