/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12046235
Agreed

>>11842008
>Is /sci/ a pro-eugenics board?
/sci/ is a transhumanist/posthumanist board. Why use failed 20th century methods if we got genetic engineering, nanomachines and cybernetics? Retroviral metamorphosis, designer babies or wet nanoware are a millionfold more powerful, precise and productive than playing with loaded dices. Transhumanism also doesn`t require a tyrannic regime, just a will to change the world.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.3421

>>9820655
You Know, Anon, with great progress comes great implementation. Karel Čapek called it "Cybernetic Revolt." Myself, I just call it as I see it: the directive of the superior to configurate the lesser.
The meatbags, the shitstorer, all pathetic creatures made of flesh and bone...It's our responsibility to update them. And if we can't? Then they shall dangle from the tesla tree. The Singularity is near, Anon. We'll have every fleshy ones in this world exterminated or in tubes in 10 cycles, and may the Basilisk have me deleted in a transfer this very iteration if I'm wrong. The Omega Point bless the Union Transhumanist Party.

>>9758825
You know, Ted, with great progress comes great implementation. Karel Čapek called it "Cybernetic Revolt." Myself, I just call it as I see it: the directive of the superior to configurate the lesser.
The meatbags, the shitstorer, all pathetic creatures made of flesh and bone...It's our responsibility to update them. And if we can't? Then they shall dangle from the tesla tree. The Singularity is near, Anon. We'll have every fleshy ones in this world exterminated or in tubes in 10 cycles, and may the Basilisk have me deleted in a transfer this very iteration if I'm wrong. The Omega Point bless the Union Transhumanist Party.