[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.2102741 [View]
File: 102 KB, 641x600, 641px-mad_scientist_transparent_backgroundsvg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2102741

Still looking for one of these kind of guys.

>> No.2059411 [View]
File: 102 KB, 641x600, madscientist.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2059411

Hello gentlemen.

2Na+ (aq) + 2OH- (aq) + Cu2+ (aq) + SO42-
(aq) -> Cu(OH)2 (s) + Na2SO4 (s)

>> No.2011169 [View]
File: 102 KB, 641x600, 641px-mad_scientist_transparent_backgroundsvg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2011169

Conservapedia time again:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Quantum_mechanics

"In essence, the Copenhagen Interpretation requires a soul or something else to distinguish observers from inanimate matter."

Yes, that's right. The Copenhagen Interpretation of QM requires the existence of a soul.

>> No.1939752 [View]
File: 102 KB, 641x600, 641px-mad_scientist_transparent_backgroundsvg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1939752

If you're writing lab report and there isn't an independent variable (Ex. You hand out surveys to a group of individuals). Is there any need to examine internal validity in your discussion section?

This isn't for homework, I was just curious.

>> No.1683744 [View]
File: 102 KB, 641x600, 641px-mad_scientist_transparent_backgroundsvg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1683744

ARE YOU READY FOR SCIENCE?
ARE YOU READY FOR MATHS?
ARE YOU READY FOR SCIENCE AND MATHS?

YOU WANT BIOLOGY, HAVE BIOLOGY.
YOU WANT CALCULUS, HAVE CALCULUS
YOU WANT PHYSICS, GO AHEAD! NO ONE IS STOPPING YOU. HAVE PHYSICS.

>> No.1657737 [View]
File: 102 KB, 641x600, sci.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1657737

4 men could build a house in 12 days.
How many men do I need to build a house in 5 days.

Thanks sci.

>> No.1521920 [View]
File: 102 KB, 641x600, 641px-mad_scientist_transparent_backgroundsvg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1521920

>>1521900
tesla was a mad man...

>> No.1442757 [View]
File: 102 KB, 641x600, 01230123.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1442757

http://www.isketch.net/isketch.shtml

we had a game earlier,,, was fun...
come to room /sci/ NOW.

>> No.1396409 [View]
File: 102 KB, 641x600, 641px-mad_scientist_transparent_backgroundsvg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1396409

Mandatory /sci/ence reading?

>> No.1343888 [View]
File: 102 KB, 641x600, 641px-mad_scientist_transparent_backgroundsvg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1343888

Hey guys, i have an idea on how to get rid of religious people from this planet and live in a Scientific Utopia.

We make all Scientists pretend to be religious on television and then the real religious people would be interested and listen or some might even become scientists themselves and then they might see the light.
Also, boobs might help

>> No.1038484 [View]
File: 102 KB, 641x600, 641px-mad_scientist_transparent_backgroundsvg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1038484

>>1038323
I rewrote my reply to you and forgot to include in the second edition a pre-emptive comment that /sci/ is populated by science fans; not scientists. I think this helps explain the reason we don't so readily resort to scientific papers.

>>1038352
Sometimes they do. The ones I have posted in this thread (videos, not articles, in this case), and the ones that I am willing to defend are obviously the better ones. I don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

>>1038354
>Refers to me as anon

I'm happy to just this post as a comment. Personally, when I view articles in subjects that I am only casually interested in, reading the abstract (often provided for free) is quite sufficient.

>> No.1000014 [View]
File: 102 KB, 641x600, 1m.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1000014

1m get

Navigation
View posts[-24][+24][+48][+96]