/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14880698
>What? I thought external "energy" was needed to 'spin/activate' the turbine fins,
Which has nothing do do with polarizing a copper line over and over
>to rotate a rotor in the gearbox to then make AC/DC electrical currents?
No magnets, you get nothing.

>I'm merely proposing a self-sustaining, clean, free, energy generator that could be scaled up to massive power plants with relatively little work.
Which is never going to happen, specifically because of how the archaic hertzian waveform you refer to as "electricity" is used and how you'll need to adapt your device to it.

>From my understanding of modern power generation; they require additional material to operate their generators, no?
Yes. To "operate": as in spin at a constant rate. Take the magnets away and...it still does this. Add the copper archform and magnets back in and voila! "Electricity", that is to anything that also has copper and magnets in it. What also happens is hysteresis because the magnets/copper resists this polarization, that is why you need pressure mediated torque to drive it. The set up you're suggesting doesn't have the torque and would have to be scaled up and utilize more material in step up transformers.

The reality is all "Green energy" faces the dilemma of "energy density" because of this reason. They do not have the torque/efficiency to ever be utilized to their full potential without wasting more money, material and ultimately CO2. But on paper, quantified in a controlled set up they "more efficient" because investors and normies only look at it the fossil fuel/CO2 perspective. What you don't look at it from is the very method you plan to deliver this "free energy" (though a waveform of loss and destruction).

>Anyway, by having vortex/whirlpool types of generators, you could potentially use them as a type of battery similar to flywheels.
We call them "hydroelectric plants"

>>11337225

>>11284994

>>9284672

>>8098236

>>8089705
I never said you 'cant' be here or that you 'cant' post here, I only said you don't belong.

Intolerant people like >>8089398 don't (((belong))) anywhere on an anime image board, even in the science and math section.

This post happily existed in all possible states before you observed it.

Now it has collapsed into a single state, I hope your pleased.

>>6382299
I got banned for a month for creating this image and posting it here.

Kindo turned me off of this place.

original version, for reference

>>6320158
Pic related