/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10563694
>If we learn to effectively control sub-atomic particles this wouldn't be an issue with concentrated fusion reactions
That doesn't change the fact that you are talking about truly absurd amounts of energy, not anything that's going to be available to humans any time soon, or even any time in the next 10,000 years.

>Heat is transferred either through infrared radiation
Except that the heat being generated inside of the bubble is due to Hawking radiation, so who knows what its properties will be? Either way, you're still talking about temperatures far higher than the ones that are present during atomic fusion

>Plot the trajectory before travelling the distance
Except of, course, you can't tell it to stop so have fun roasting whatever you pointed your bubble at with gamma radiation before plowing right through it.

>It's essentially a 3D ocean and we can adapt to the changes.
It essentially is not. Air and water are both substances that flow and it was a relatively simple process for us to make vessels which take advantage of those fundamental electromagnetic properties without having to expend stupefying amounts of energy. Space is a vacuum, the scale is unimaginably vastly larger, the distances between interacting objects far greater, the influence of electromagnetism is strictly localized and gravity plays a larger role on these scales. Humans are creatures adapted to life on Earth. In space, robotic life is better suited, so it will not be us, it will be our descendent species colonizing the universe.