/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9579182
>You stated a loose definition of infinity as a number using dedekind cut which by itself is useless as dedekind cut is not necessary for numbers to exist
You are confusing necessity with sufficiency. The fact that infinity can be constructed as a number is sufficient to show that it is a number. But that does not imply it is necessary. Once again you fail at basic logic.

>what you didn't do is use infinity as a number to any degree
I mentioned several times the user of infinity as the cardinality of a set.

You lost on every front, even the irrelevant demand to "demonstrate infinity as a number." Even you know you lost. Stay mad.

>>9399233
In the bonus DVD behind the scenes extras of Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story, Ben Stiller reveals that he spent months researching Grothendiek in order to perfect his role as Globo Gym leader White Goodman.