/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14631839
i already debunked you last time you posted this. for example,
>some politician said this.
wrong, it was said by a climate scientist. i'm going to assume you're capable of finding the old thread and the paper, because you don't deserve me doing that work for you again.

>>14578598
All the claims in my original image are trivial to verify. All of your claims are made up nonsense. For example,
>some politician [Al Gore] said this
Unequivocally wrong. See e.g.
>https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-climate-change/fact-check-al-gore-did-not-predict-ice-caps-melting-by-2013-but-misrepresented-data-idUSL1N2RV0K6
>Gore didn’t make this prediction himself but was citing findings from a climate researcher.
>Gore cited findings from climatologist Dr Wieslav Maslowski, a research professor at the Naval Postgraduate School
>In an interview with The Times published on Dec. 15, 2009 (here), Dr Maslowski said: “It’s unclear to me how this figure was arrived at. I would never try to estimate likelihood at anything as exact as this.”
Hmm, really? Really, Maslowski? Let's see what the science says. We see here a paper by Maslowski from January 2008.
>If this trend persists the Arctic Ocean will become ice--free by ~2013!
Huh? But he told the media he would never say that! What the hell is going on? Oh, yeah, him and his ilk lie all the fucking time, and morons like you eat it up. I'm putting more effort into this than you obviously will, so idk why i'm even bothering. Go back to shilling, dumb fuck.