/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6297147
take a look at this

Case closed.

>QM is a hoax

Obligatory

>>5629603
Short version : Bullshift

obligatory

It's been confirmed for bullshift.

I mentioned these errors in the last thread, but:

>When they had the optical sensors turned on and recorded the results, it showed a pattern you would expect from a particle.
Measuring which slit the particle goes through gives you a single-slit pattern. Not a particle pattern.

>When they had the optical sensor tuned on but didn't record the data (like sensor turned on but didn't have it hooked up to a disk or magnetic tape drive to record) it showed a pattern that you would expect from a wave.
When the which-way information is measured and the results are simply discarded, you get a single-slit pattern, the same as if you had looked at the results.

>>5550365
>When they had the optical sensors turned on and recorded the results, it showed a particle pattern.
I must correct you here: Measuring which slit the particle goes through gives you a single-slit pattern. Not a particle pattern. Pic related. Yes, it does matter if you eventually want to understand any of this.

>>5550357
>When they had the optical sensors turned on and recorded the results, it showed a particle pattern.
I must correct you here: Measuring which slit the particle goes through gives you a single-slit pattern. Not a particle pattern. Pic related. Yes, it does matter if you eventually want to understand any of this.

>>5536824
>if the measurement device interfered with the particle it would only nudge it
This is exactly what happens. Pic very related.

>not fucking transform it from a particle pattern to a wave pattern
This is not what happens. This is a misconception propagated by pseudoscience documentaries.

I just started the video, and there are already errors on the first slide.

proven to be bullshit
/thread

>>5492777