/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6229445
It not a science. `social sciences' are nothing to do with scientific endeavour. They are about categorizing human society and behaviours. stamp collecting in other words. Stop flattering yourself u r not a scientist. u r a parasitic turd.

>>6213118
was tat entropy?

Alright /sci/. I have heard the critics.
But you are still here to see the film.

Let's rephrase the question.

A language system created by a species on another planet would evolve completely different to our own right?

Whilst we can only suppose what these differences might be if such a planet existed. It is possible to speculate is it not?

It is therefore a legitimate entry point to discuss exactly what these differences might be and reconsider mathematics if it was constructed from an entirely different philosophic, cultural and linguistic base?

Do you still hate me /sci/?

>>3951891

Saging with a picture is a time-honored activity, why is your ass so pained?

Giant faggot's blog about dicks

If I get dubs, I'm not reporting OP. Otherwise I will obey rules.

>>3770407
the fuck is this?

>>3666506
What the fuck is that supposed to mean, faggot? What do you think this one is based on, unicorns and rainbows? No wonder you used a faggot as the pic.

Not this shit again...

>>3197876
I fail to see the point of the fucking copypasta.
If the intention is just to make women appear like manipulative bitches then mission accomplished i guess.

OP is a cunt.

>>3185547
you get trolled too easily. pic related.

this almost looks as if Harriet and EK is the same person. If not, hats off to Harriet for defending here in spite of a backstab like this.

Also, y'all nigga's postin' inna troll thread.

not sure if troll or very stupid.

Also, good luck if you think IQ will help you have a meaningful conversation. Not to mention that even 'intelligent' people tend to be stupid outside their specialty (and sometimes even in it)

so in a 2 sample t-test where n1=n2 and s1=s2

degrees of freedom will = 2(n-1)

why?

Prommiscuity of either gender is not desirable for the society. Monogamous model of family provides best resource base for upbringing of one's offspring as well as minimal social tensions when individuals of either genders are deprived of the joys of intercourse (and having their own offspring).

Also, if you disagree with that, you are a selfish prick, which is, contrary to belief of certain marginal, sociopathic philosophies, not a good thing.

Also, pic related

Oh great and powerful /sci/:

There was a nifty universal panorama linked here yesterday...or the day before that? Anyways, it was clever and I, being the idiot, forgot to bookmark it.

Link plux?

>>2994233
An atheist doesn't have to prove something doesn't exist, he just has to believe it himself that it doesn't.
A theist on the other hand is the one who says it exists, therefore he should be the one to prove it does. For instance, it would be like me saying the yeti does exist, you say "Prove it". I say "Prove it doesn't exist". How do you do so? Why would you even need to do so considering you're not the one making shit up.., even though in this case you are the one making shit up, so how about you prove it does exist rather than asking the people how say it doesn't to

>>2897118
if I'm awesome and OP's mom is hot, then why is OP (Being the spawn of me and OP's mom) a fag, and not both me and his hot bangin' mom?

I dunno, OP. I dunno.

>When she didn't submerge, the police were called.
*emerge
>The girls told everyone she fell... They believed them.
with no other witnesses, how has OP heard of this?
>If you don't repost this...
heheh...nah, GTFO OP
>>>/x/

sage goes in all fields
OP is a faggot.

OP understands nothing about genetics or human reproduction.

Hey guys whats going on in this threa-OH GOD!

>>2599599
God damnit you're right.

This sort of thing isn't even what this board is about, you know. Some of us come here to talk about science and get bored when this sort of thing dominates the front page.

tl;dr I'm reporting your thread, go fuck your very own self.

You like movies, OP. Here's a good one. It explains everything.

Troll harder, faggot.
One, it takes quite a long time for light to get here. Two, luminous intensity falls off as the square of the distance, so the light of just about any decently far-off star will be imperceptible. Three, interstellar space has big clouds of semi-opaque gas and dust.