/sci/ - Science & Math

>windows 10
>asking why you need basic complex analysis for physics

why would you even ask this question anyway?
it's math, which is basically the skeleton of physics
i would understand if you were ranting about how you had to have a certain amount of humanities hours to get a physics degree, but math?
physics is basically the science of turning word problems into math problems

if you're actually serious about this i'm worried about you

edition=1
edition+1 = first addition = second edition
edition+2 = second addition = third edition

>>7480275
nice reaction face anon. here take this one.

you would just end up with a bunch of old people dying from childbirth

also, if you live long enough, you'll probably have accumulated enough weird shit in your body (like, but not limited to, lead and mercury) to cause any offspring you produce to be riddled with birth defects

i think the only reasonable method for reaching immortality is to fund more biomedical research regarding aging, push new students toward the topic, and wait

and if it turns out that biological immortality is beyond our reach, there's always the hope of uploading your brain into a computer or whatever, but that's probably not going to happen

>>7340956
you're trying too hard anon and you're not even good at it.
I mean, you don't even come up with a new base proposition, what about the golden ration base ? this would surely rust some jimmies.

>>7275878
>>7275893
> I am never been overweight
>260lbs

260lbs is 118kg, the limit BMI between overwieght and obesity (not between normal weight and overweight) is 30 (kg*m^-2) so if you have a BMI of 30 then you're 1,98m tall, or 6 feet and 6 inches tall if you prefer... No need to say that few people are that tall.

TL;DR : you're fat, and considering you speak in lbs you're probably an amerifat, sorry.

math major here, computer science and programming as a hobby (inb4 computer science is math)

haskell is very mathematical in nature, but nobody uses it. i personally love it.

C is good if you want to really get to the nitty gritty side of computers and software

C++ is basically C with a bunch of confusing syntax added in for object oriented programming. it's good at a whole lot of things.

java is purely object oriented and i personally find it a pain to work with. any advanced stuff is going to require knowledge of a bunch of third party packages and a hefty IDE. though i've been told that employers look for java programmers. take this with a grain of salt.

the lisp family is great if you want to explore computer science. lisp also has a great community and /g/ has a lisp general thread up pretty much all the time.

python is a great language. it is easy to pick up, and has great advanced features for the not-so-casual user. it also has a huge userbase and lots of libraries for things like math and science. this would be my recommendation.


another set of languages worth noting are the ones more specifically designed for math and statistics related stuff, such as R, maple, and matlab
i do not have much experience in these three and can not speak for them, but i hear they're important or something

tutorialspoint has pretty good tutorials on most things, they also have this thing that lets you try languages without installing a bunch of compilers and interpreters and stuff

http://www.tutorialspoint.com/codingground.htm

>some guy mixes his semen with luminol and puts it in a test tube
>radioactive emergency

because inner product is linear in the first parameter
<Bv,v> = B<v,v>

B<v,v>/<v,v> * v = Bv

come on man i'm an art major and i know this

>>7000096
i messed that up
that should be F^(z)! is F^(z) composed with F^(z-1)!
by vanish i mean it eventually reaches the identity function, otherwise it would just apply the whole function chain and you'd end up with a scalar

i think
let me go get my paper

>>6988189
Top line would be something around 5sin(0.5(x))+0.5
Other one I got no idea, OP.

>science fiction
>fiction
>/sci/ mad
seems about right

4 8 15 16 23 42 ?